Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 11 - Jul 16
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Antique Mourning Enamel Band in 18 Carat Gold; Circa 1845About this treasure: Filled with love this beautiful collectors piece would be a wonderful addition to any jewellery lovers collection. Created in 1845 marks the passing of cherished loved one, this mourning ring truly a captured movement of love in time. Outside the band we have fine intricate enamelling In memory Of in striking back against a buttery 18 carat gold band. Within is the wonderful hand engraved dedication Jne Cottingham died 27 March
About this treasure:Filled with love this beautiful collectors piece would be a wonderful addition to any jewellery lovers collection. Created in 1845 marks the passing of cherished loved one, this mourning ring truly a captured movement of love in time.
Outside the band we have fine intricate enamelling ‘In memory Of in striking back against a buttery 18 carat gold band. Within is the wonderful hand engraved dedication ‘Jne Cottingham died 27 March 1845 aged 77‘.
This would have been created soon after Jonathanss death to commemorate his life and to be worn and remembered by a loved one. 77 is also a remarkable age for the era when the average life expectancy was around 40. This, coupled with the high quality of mourning ring, indicate he was a man of high status.
We not only love the story behind this ring, but we also love how it epitomises antique sentimental jewellery. Mourning jewellery became popular in the Georgian and Victorian era as a way of remembering those who have passed. They are testament to the adoration of one to another. They have always been cherished by later generations and have certainly seen a huge revival in recent years. Mourning jewellery can be found in a few styles, often filled with sentimental images, dark enamelling and unique engraving.
The entire ring is created in 18 carat gold. And with a width of over 7.6 mm this is a rare and particularly lovely antique ring.
This jewel is entirely original and in remarkable condition considering its age. The use of the very best material, ornate fine features and attention to detail is testament to the love and craftsmanship!
DETAILS
MATERIAL/HALLMARK: Crown (pictorial mark for gold) 18 (18 carat gold) Leopard (Lonon Assay Office)
ERA: 1845
MEASUREMENTS :
Ring size: K (UK/AU) 5.25 (US)
WIDTH: 7.6 mm approx.
WEIGHT: 5.1 grams approx.
Condition: Overall in splendid antique condition with only a fine patina to the gold and enamel. There is the small sections of enamel missing or damaged on the band however these are subtle.
-Please feel free to take a look at all photographs for condition before committing to buy. We do not offer refunds so if in doubt drop us and email and wed be happy to help!
-We ship worldwide on all orders & parcels are sent fully insured and well packed in our signature pink boxes
-We accept all methods of payment, and orders will be shipped out within 1-3 business days.
-All customs information is declared and we are not responsible for any import duties or delays incurred.
> All of the jewels we work with are antique or vintage and as such they are sold ‘as seen. This means theyre not perfect. They carry the love and journey of generations who love them before. These jewels should be worn with extra and love and care.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 2089 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Great toy
Color: Blue
Great toy, too bad my Shih Tzu is afraid of it. I love the way the movement is subtle and random.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Best toy for dogs
Color: Blue
My dog plays with this for hours!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 14, 2026
★★★★★ 4
I wouldn’t recommend this for strong chewers.
Color: Orange, Color: Orange
Is it fun? Sure. Was it easy to charge and set up? Yep. That being said, this toy kind of fell flat for me. It really didn’t do any big movements once charged that I expected it to, so that was a bummer. I initially got it for my dog, but my cats were more interested in this than my dog was. The battery does seem to last a long time and the motor is pretty quiet. I WOULD NOT recommend this toy for strong chewers as the material for this is a foam rubber and I don’t think it’s durable enough for strong chewers. While the material makes this ball extremely lightweight for more movement, a strong chewer would have this disintegrated in five minutes flat. My Dog is a super strong chewer. I don’t think I would feel comfortable leaving him unattended with this because I know he would destroy it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 5, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Interactive puppy fun
Color: Blue
Pups love this and I enjoy watching them have so much fun. Serious playtime followed by a well earned nap!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 4, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Well-designed and quiet, but didn’t keep my dog interested
Color: Blue
My dog was interested in this at first, but she would lose interest after a few minutes and move on.
I do like that it’s quieter than the hard plastic ball toys, and the charge lasts well. The internal charging port that twists closed is also a nice design feature.
That said, it will occasionally turn on by itself, which can be a little surprising. Overall, it has some nice features, but it just didn’t keep my dog engaged.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 30, 2026